It is not right to be content with mere assent. One must also learn to reveal the truth. – Marcus Aurelius
Reflection
Not every mark in the codebase is technical.
Some are ethical. Some are personal.
There's a conditional wrapped in a truth that no longer holds.
A config switch toggled for one sprint, now silently permanent.
A path that returns safely, only because no one's tested the edges in months.
You made that decision with intention.
But the intent never made it into the commit.
That's how systems grow obscure.
Not through breakage, but through quiet forgetfulness.
A log that speaks only when failure screams.
A helper that assumes too much but explains too little.
An undocumented rule that governs an entire workflow.
You didn't mean to hide the reasoning.
But by not naming it, you did.
Humility isn't always second-guessing your work.
Sometimes, it's externalizing your thinking, so others don't have to reconstruct it under pressure.
Because every unspoken assumption becomes technical debt with interest.
And in fast-moving teams, the riskiest logic isn't the broken one.
It's the one that no longer has a voice.
Today's Insight
Humility isn't silence.
It's the discipline of leaving clarity where you once stood, so no one has to guess what you believed.
Action Steps
- Annotate with Context, Not Just Code - Choose a decision you made quickly, a skipped check, an edge you bypassed. Add a @rationale comment. Note what you assumed, what might break, and what shifted your thinking.
- Refactor the Forgotten - Use git log --follow to trace a file's last moment of clarity. If it hasn't changed in a year, don't just read it. Breathe it back to life. Insert what's missing: context, comments, constraints.
- Make Confidence Explicit - Where you believe "this will never happen," write why. Use comments like "// guaranteed by upstream guard" or "// unreachable if token is fresh". Confidence without explanation becomes confusion under stress.
- Surface Decisions, Not Just Fixes - In your next pull request, don't just list what changed, explain why. Add a short "Reasoning" section. Let your teammates review your thinking, not just your
Consider This
Does your code show what you believed at the time or just what it does now?
Because what you leave behind shouldn't make others guess what you meant.